I recommend minor revision

WebApr 9, 2024 · The Editorial Office is waiting for your revised manuscript. As an author, this manuscript status means that it’s time to review your manuscript and edit it using the comments provided. We expect to receive revisions within 5 days (for minor revisions) or within 10 days (for major revisions). This is inclusive of weekends and holidays. WebAddress all points raised by the editor and reviewers. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments …

Step by Step Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript Wiley

WebNov 5, 2012 · The associate editor makes one of four recommendations for publication: accept, accept with minor revisions, major revisions required with no guarantee of acceptance, and reject. The associate editor makes a recommendation to the editor for a … income driven application form https://illuminateyourlife.org

Asked to review a manuscript; when to choose "minor" or "major ... - Reddit

WebPerform any additional experiments or analyses the reviewers recommend (unless you feel that they would not make your paper better; if so, please provide sufficient explanation as to why you believe this to be the case in your response letter). Provide a polite and scientific rebuttal to any points or comments you disagree with. WebApr 16, 2024 · My review article received a minor revision with one of the comments as follows: “The advantages, disadvantages, and synergy of each strategy need to be … WebThe first read-through is a skim-read. It will help you form an initial impression of the paper and get a sense of whether your eventual recommendation will be to accept or reject the paper. First Read Considerations Keep a pen and paper handy when skim-reading. incentive\\u0027s rw

The Meaning of a Review Decision: The Road to Publication

Category:Instructions for Reviewers - IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging …

Tags:I recommend minor revision

I recommend minor revision

Response times for Exams requiring Sonographer review …

WebCommon reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision. There are six common reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision: The literature review can benefit from additional sources: As a reviewer with expertise on the topic of the manuscript, you may be aware of a recent publication or discussion that the authors do not include yet. The relevance and originality … WebIf recommending revision, state specific changes you feel need to be made. The author can then reply to each point in turn. Some journals offer the option to recommend rejection …

I recommend minor revision

Did you know?

WebOne recommended major revision, two recommended minor revision, and one recommended acceptance.) I know that revisions, both major and minor, hint at a higher chance of acceptance. Revise and resubmit, however, is likely followed by a rejection. So I'm wondering which one this response is. THANKS!! Vote 9 9 comments Best Add a Comment WebMinor revision. The paper will be ready for publication after light revisions. Please list the revisions you would recommend the author makes. Major revision. The paper needs substantial changes such as expanded data analysis, widening of the literature review, or rewriting sections of the text. Reject. The paper isn’t suitable for ...

WebApr 13, 2024 · Accept with minor revisions ... Make the recommended changes and resubmit to the same journal: This option could well be your top choice if you are keen to publish in a particular journal and if the editor has indicated that they will accept your paper if revisions are made. If the editor has issued an outright rejection and does not wish to ... WebApr 15, 2024 · Six minor proposals were rejected, including forcing large companies to publish how many over-55s they employ, and the creation of a special contract for older workers. The appearance of the text in France's Official Journal -- the gazette of record -- means it has now been enacted into law. "The Social Security Code is thus amended.

WebNov 27, 2024 · I have submitted my manuscript to one of the peer-reviewed journals of chemistry and the decision was 'recommended for publication subject to minor revision'. I … WebJul 13, 2024 · After submitting major revision, I got minor revision with only one comment from editor, while one reviewer accepted it (it was not sent to second reviewer). I …

WebI recommend you try the meatballs. I will be recommending the meatballs tonight. Both of these examples are correct. However, “I recommend” here means we’re recommending …

WebIt is very possible to get a minor revision as a first decision, and then major revision as second decision, and finally a rejection. This can be heart-breaking to authors. incentive\\u0027s rpWebMinor revision. Your article has a very good chance of being accepted for publication, but the reviewers have requested minor amendments to be made. These changes can usually … income driven based repayment formWebHowever, my supervisor told me several times when submitting papers that there's no such thing as minor revisions anymore and everyone seems to always say major just because they can. 2 of my papers came back as major revisions but it took maybe 2 hours of editing grammer and spelling to fix it. incentive\\u0027s s0WebIn other words, if you receive such a revised manuscript for review, you should make either a recommendation to accept (possibly with a minor revision) or reject with no further … incentive\\u0027s s2WebApr 15, 2024 · Six minor proposals were rejected, including forcing large companies to publish how many over-55s they employ, and the creation of a special contract for older … income drawdown option with minimum guaranteeWebJan 9, 2024 · Often the peer review process progresses smoothly through the steps: A new manuscript is submitted; appropriate reviewers are identified, invited and promptly accept; … incentive\\u0027s s5WebAccept with Minor Revision This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is accepted. The AE will check if all the comments are addressed. Sample reviewer comments: “ This paper proposes a novel approach towards solving the reconstruction problem of motion corrupted fetal MRI. incentive\\u0027s s4