WebWe have held that unqualified opposition to capital punishment is a valid ground for challenge for cause in a case where such punishment is within the scope of the permitted penalty. Carson v. Commonwealth, Ky., 382 S.W.2d 85. Such a commitment by a prospective juror is a clear admission of prejudice and further examining him could serve no ... WebLAMAR LEE BOYD V. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY Date: November 22, 2006 Docket Number: 2005-SC-0000512-MR LOUISVILLE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY V. JONATHON MARK ROBERTSON (INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF SHYTONE M. ROBERSON) Date: November 22, 2006 Docket Number: 2005-SC-000188-DG …
Ragland v. Commonwealth, 421 S.W.2d 79 – CourtListener.com
Weboutcome of the criminal case. Ragland appealed his criminal conviction to the Kentucky Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court reversed Ragland’s conviction, holding that key evidence supporting the conviction was unreliable and was inadmissible upon re-trial. The Commonwealth’s petition for rehearing was denied, and the case was remanded to WebThe evidence for the Commonwealth is that Duff was drunk. The defendant denied having gone down the hill shooting; that he then owned a pistol like that described; and testified that he was not drunk nor armed and had come upon Lizzie's body, with her jacket buttoned up, and without any wound or blood being visible. regamedll_cs
TONIA CALDWELL v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY :: 2024 - Justia Law
WebKentucky; Ragland v. Commonwealth, 2014–SC–000267–MR. Document Cited authorities 26 Cited in 26 Precedent Map Related. ... OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE NOBLE: Citation: 476 S.W.3d 236: Parties: Patrick Deon Ragland, Appellant v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellee: Docket Number: 2014–SC–000267–MR: Decision Date: 17 December … WebThe trial court erroneously confined its Daubert analysis to the ICP methodology of CBLA and failed to consider the scientific reliability of the conclusions drawn by the … WebApr 27, 2007 · See Ragland v. Commonwealth, 191 S.W.3d 569 (Ky.2006). It is also well-settled in this Commonwealth that after a hearing on a defendant's suppression motion, the trial court's findings are deemed to be conclusive if supported by substantial evidence, see, e.g., Talbott v. Commonwealth, 968 S.W.2d 76 (Ky.1998); Canler v. regam electric leeds